As we explore the world of cookieless digital advertising, marketers will be focusing much of their attention on walled gardens with valuable first-party data. However, even walled gardens have issues we will need to navigate through in order to achieve business goals which are tangible to the financial guardians of brands.
Most analysts predict that walled gardens (in particular Google) will be the safest place to conduct audience targeted buys in 2024. Even while Google’s DSP allows marketers to buy a lot of inventory, it is currently more limited in audio, connected TV and DOOH inventory. These are channels where context is probably more important than the precision of the audience and where there is likely going to be a need to diversify to other advertising platforms to achieve a successful omni-channel strategy.
Using Facebook User Data
Facebook does have robust behavioral data from signed-in users; however, iOS 15 makes it more challenging to perform audience-based buys and to attribute conversions. Some of our early campaigns showed a 15x increase in CPA within the platform, but nearly no impact on actual sales. This means that conversion data on the Facebook platform was (and is) solely directional for most advertisers. While good for the business, this might be more challenging for marketers trying to prove their marketing is “working.”
Should You Trust the Algorithm?
The big ad tech players, and thus some agencies, will likely advise brands to ‘trust the algorithm’ even more than they have in the past, as Google, Facebook and Amazon don’t give specialists a lot of control over or insights about many aspects of their buying decisions. Facebook in particular makes it challenging to control frequency, and DV360’s lookalike modeling is very opaque. Against a lack of accurate measurement across each walled garden, brands and their agencies need to develop more holistic, advanced measurement frameworks.
How Will Cookie Deprecation Affect CPMs?
While scale is impacted slightly outside of Google Chrome and Android apps, there are still ample opportunities to bid for inventory in these environments. However, with fewer buying platforms to conduct audience-based buys and fewer impressions to scale against, CPMs will likely increase, in particular on video. This might put pressure on agencies to ‘keep the costs down’, which in turn may increase traffic from bots and fraudulent inventory. Brands need to expect an increase in CPMs while not incentivizing a decrease in inventory quality.
A Walled Garden SWOT Analysis
Strengths – Google, Facebook, Amazon and Apple each have huge first-party data sets. And not just in volume of users, they have robust metadata around each profile as well, from account information, purchase history and behavior. Even if ID-based solutions grow in count, it’s possible we may not be able to append significant amounts of secondary data to each profile to be scalable for marketers.
Weaknesses – You will undoubtedly need adjustments in terms of attribution and measurement. Even today, if you were to believe the metrics from each platform, nearly all of your automated marketing channels would have +ROI for the same purchase. Paid search, Facebook conversion ads and programmatic retargeting can’t all have a CPA of $10. They can’t produce 10,000 sales when you only sold 3,000 products. This is because each is taking credit for any time a user touches their ad. Because the walled gardens don’t share a common user profile, multi-touch attribution can be disjointed and inconsistent. It’s safe to say the methods of achieving measurement will have to change.
Opportunities – Lean into zero-, first- and second-party data in walled garden platforms, and rely less on retargeting. This allows for stronger prospecting and less reliance on audiences that were likely to “convert” anyway and, therefore, inflate marketing metrics.
Threats – Because many marketers and brands will be leaning into walled gardens, there will likely be an increase in advertising costs on these platforms. Budgets will need to increase to achieve the same scale as before.
So what does this mean?
At present, our suggestion is to lean into walled gardens for precise audience targeting. But, begin measuring success of your advertising program at a higher level. Some examples of this include matched market tests, media mix modeling, and control vs. exposed methodologies.
Yes, this will make it more challenging to know which 50% of your marketing spend is effective. But, it’s the best solution with the reduction of transparency in algorithmic data and therefore less understanding of success from a conversion data standpoint.
This will also force marketers to start looking at the data as a whole. It’s time to get away from optimizing towards last-click and last-touch metrics. They have provided misleading signals for years.
Regarding measurement changes, advertising campaigns need to be set-up to reach business goals rather than just media metric KPIs. To achieve this, individual channels and tactics will need to identify leading indicators to optimize toward. Engagement rates, reach, completion rate, and measures of media effectiveness like CPM/CPC should become more of a focus rather than CPAs.
Check out our 5 Step Guide to Measuring Marketing ROI to get started:
